50 Comments

Thanks for bringing this to attention -- Britain is most definitely a centuries-long criminal syndicate. To the lake of fire with those bottomless sons of perdition.

Expand full comment

It's not all bad, but sadly most of our politicians are either 'Christian' Zionists, or have married Zionists.

Expand full comment

The ongoing discourse surrounding global wealth inequality continues to spotlight the colossal concentration of wealth in the hands of a select few. Research indicates that the top 20 wealthiest individuals and companies around the globe hold an immense portion of global resources, igniting a debate on equitable wealth distribution.

**The Titans of Wealth**

The wealthiest individuals in the world, as of the latest data, include visionaries like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bernard Arnault, Bill Gates, and Warren Buffet. Others such as Larry Ellison, Larry Page, and Sergey Brin occupy this elite list. These individuals have built their fortunes through tech innovations, luxury empires, and strategic investments.

Simultaneously, renowned companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Saudi Aramco, Amazon, and Alphabet lead the corporate sector. Industries spanning from technology, energy, and retail are represented by corporations like Tesla, Facebook, Alibaba, and Berkshire Hathaway, which contribute significantly to global GDP.

**Redistribution for Global Betterment**

Reimagining a world where wealth serves humanity's collective good begins with detailed financial transparency. Comprehensive audits and valuations reveal that these top entities control trillions of dollars. Wealth is often stored in vast real estate holdings, shares, bonds, and diversified investments.

To bridge the inequality gap, a multifaceted wealth redistribution strategy is proposed that adheres to global legal frameworks yet emphasizes moral imperatives.

1. **Global Free Healthcare and Education**: By reallocating just a fraction of the accumulated wealth, substantial funding can be devoted to universal healthcare and education. Historical data suggests that a fraction of 1% of the individual and corporate wealth pool could transform both sectors, ensuring no family bears the burden of illness or the quest for knowledge.

2. **Poverty Alleviation and Middle-Class Empowerment**: Establishing a global fund financed by a focused levy on mega fortunes would concentrate on eradicating poverty. This fund would empower citizens worldwide, allowing universal access to middle-class status through infrastructural development, entrepreneurship programs, and skill-building initiatives.

3. **Global Union Rights**: A cooperative global effort affirms that labor rights are human rights. Creating a universally recognized labor rights charter, backed by severe penalties, would deter any attempt to subvert workers’ rights. Special judicial bodies could be established to enforce these rights, ensuring that the economic gains lift all boats.

**Unifying for a Just Future**

Achieving this vision demands unprecedented global solidarity. While wealth does not translate easily into cash flow, its conversion into universal benefits can be achieved through technology-driven platforms, transparent financial systems, and cooperative policies.

Global unity is vital. While force should be the last resort, strategic partnerships with international organizations, advocates, and enlightened leadership pave the way. A globally legal approach is both achievable and imperative for sustainable transformation.

In this grand endeavor, the focus must remain on justice and inclusion. By respecting legal norms yet relentlessly pushing forward equitable reforms, humanity can craft an era where wealth wisely used heralds an era of shared abundance.

Expand full comment

On the bright side anti-Zionist views are upheld by law as shown by the case against Prof David Miller.

The fact is, gangs are running our country and using laws they have successfully created through the manipulation of general law makers to silence injustice. It is us the people that are left to educate others so we make a stand collectively. We are also, under our noses, becoming Americas little puppet.

Expand full comment

I think the strings have been there for a rather long time

Expand full comment

The ongoing discourse surrounding global wealth inequality continues to spotlight the colossal concentration of wealth in the hands of a select few. Research indicates that the top 20 wealthiest individuals and companies around the globe hold an immense portion of global resources, igniting a debate on equitable wealth distribution.

**The Titans of Wealth**

The wealthiest individuals in the world, as of the latest data, include visionaries like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bernard Arnault, Bill Gates, and Warren Buffet. Others such as Larry Ellison, Larry Page, and Sergey Brin occupy this elite list. These individuals have built their fortunes through tech innovations, luxury empires, and strategic investments.

Simultaneously, renowned companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Saudi Aramco, Amazon, and Alphabet lead the corporate sector. Industries spanning from technology, energy, and retail are represented by corporations like Tesla, Facebook, Alibaba, and Berkshire Hathaway, which contribute significantly to global GDP.

**Redistribution for Global Betterment**

Reimagining a world where wealth serves humanity's collective good begins with detailed financial transparency. Comprehensive audits and valuations reveal that these top entities control trillions of dollars. Wealth is often stored in vast real estate holdings, shares, bonds, and diversified investments.

To bridge the inequality gap, a multifaceted wealth redistribution strategy is proposed that adheres to global legal frameworks yet emphasizes moral imperatives.

1. **Global Free Healthcare and Education**: By reallocating just a fraction of the accumulated wealth, substantial funding can be devoted to universal healthcare and education. Historical data suggests that a fraction of 1% of the individual and corporate wealth pool could transform both sectors, ensuring no family bears the burden of illness or the quest for knowledge.

2. **Poverty Alleviation and Middle-Class Empowerment**: Establishing a global fund financed by a focused levy on mega fortunes would concentrate on eradicating poverty. This fund would empower citizens worldwide, allowing universal access to middle-class status through infrastructural development, entrepreneurship programs, and skill-building initiatives.

3. **Global Union Rights**: A cooperative global effort affirms that labor rights are human rights. Creating a universally recognized labor rights charter, backed by severe penalties, would deter any attempt to subvert workers’ rights. Special judicial bodies could be established to enforce these rights, ensuring that the economic gains lift all boats.

**Unifying for a Just Future**

Achieving this vision demands unprecedented global solidarity. While wealth does not translate easily into cash flow, its conversion into universal benefits can be achieved through technology-driven platforms, transparent financial systems, and cooperative policies.

Global unity is vital. While force should be the last resort, strategic partnerships with international organizations, advocates, and enlightened leadership pave the way. A globally legal approach is both achievable and imperative for sustainable transformation.

In this grand endeavor, the focus must remain on justice and inclusion. By respecting legal norms yet relentlessly pushing forward equitable reforms, humanity can craft an era where wealth wisely used heralds an era of shared abundance.

Expand full comment

Starmer and his ilk are all bought and paid for agents of Israel, they openly admit to doing Israels bidding (the false smears against Corbyn is one easily proved example). We have so many politicians in Westminster at the moment (Labour, Conservative and Reform) who could and should be charged with treason. They have taken money from foreign governments (government linked groups) and then put those foreign interests above the welfare and needs of the population that elected them. We could never 'take our country back' as some of them loved to say during Brexit while they remain in charge, they've given it all away to foreign nations to line their own pockets

Expand full comment

So if I say fuck Isreal what happens

Expand full comment

Lol, so I replied to a friends comment on face book and talked about how the current prime minister of the UK had accepted money from Israel and the connotations from him being a bought and paid for agent of Israel and guess what? My comment has been removed and I'm now in Facebook jail!!! Apparently now I'm not allowed to complain about my own government on face book. Currently awaiting a knock on my door tomorrow accessing me of being s terrorist sympathiser.

Expand full comment

Great article. I'll be featuring it in my next Reflections from the Heart of the Empire.

Expand full comment

Small point: Nice piece but includes a repeated confusion: the word “prescribed” applies to the positive sanctioning of an act or indeed the issuing of a medicine. “Proscribed” means to forbid as in forbidding support for a purported “terrorist” group and this was the word you should have used in several places. But keep up the good work!

Expand full comment

Thanks for catching that, just fixed it.

Expand full comment

Look up Professor David Miller’s lawsuit against the University of Bristol. He won.

“The belief that Israel’s actions amount to apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide are “worthy of respect in a democratic society”, an employment tribunal has concluded in a landmark decision.”

I see of course the goon squad attempts to frighten journalists but look to David Miller’s case. He fought back and won.

https://amp.theguardian.com/money/2024/oct/14/anti-zionist-beliefs-worthy-respect-uk-tribunal-finds-israel

Expand full comment

I hope you stretched well before you wrote this, because it's an Olympic-level reach.

Expand full comment

There seems to be confusion about who is committing acts of genocide. The group responsible are terrorists who practice Islam and have repeatedly called for the extermination of the Jewish people.

Expand full comment

While Israel bombs them into the Stone Age.

Expand full comment

Lmao are you on crack?

Expand full comment

Nobody is calling for the extermination of the Jewish People. Some are calling for the end of the racist, evil, of Zionism.

Expand full comment

🤣🤣🤣 big difference between calling for a genocide and committing one, evil baby killing vermins.

Expand full comment

Relatively few have even called for one, unlike in Nazi Israel!

Expand full comment

No one has been jailed yet, if ever, though, and there would be a huge outcry if they were!!! I have sent a direct Parliamentary Petition to the House of Commons about this care of my local MP

Expand full comment

Um… how does this make sense when the BBC regularly criticizes Israel?

Also Hamas isn’t a terrorist organization because they are “aiming to end the Israeli occupation of Palestine” - they are aiming to kill all Jews and non-believers in this world and use their civilian population intentionally as pawns and shields. Please stop ignoring the obvious.

Expand full comment

The BBC rarely criticise Israel and fail to cover all manner of war crimes and atrocities!

Expand full comment

I realized recently that many that are called terrorists are actually anti-colonial, settlement, resistance organizations. Which I can definitely sympathize with.

Expand full comment

Are you aware of the history of Arab aggression and Muslim supremacy in the region? Are you accounting for that at all when it comes to forming your opinions?

Expand full comment

We're fast approaching (if we've not already breached the fine line) where the division between family members, co-workers, community members, church acquaintances (and "denominations"), etc. will eventually be a tool for "snitching" on those who "dare" to take an objective position and to lament and decry the activities being conducted and sanctioned by western governments -- the latter (ecclesiastical "brothers/sisters" turning one another in due to the severe polarization something that is as plain as common sense could easily defuse) being deeply ingrained and "sacred" territory that is not historically pliable or subject to rational compromise. The era of civilized dialog seems to have largely passed and the politicization of anything contrary to the CURRENT status quo talking points (always changing, as do the definitions and applications of terms to suit the imagined crimes being perpetrated) is forbotten, subject to severe and swift punitive measures and to formal ostracization and humiliation. As a person of faith who has attempted to examine "both sides" and to point out the more obvious disharmonies between the official narratives and reality, I've been accused of besmirching the chosen people, of being antisemite, and my very faith has been called into question, and that attempting to point out for example that "nations" in the old & new testaments do not refer to nation states/countries as we reference them now -- that they are people groups, families, tribes, kinship groups -- those descended from common ancestors, etc. and that no nation state has a "right to exist" because they are self-proclaimed and often established in bloodshed with force and not organic developments. History is ignored and facts that are inconvenient are twisted and trigger accusations and labels that are not applicable or relevant, from oftentimes otherwise reasonable people. Trying to legislate open discussion and exchanges regarding passionately-held beliefs, developments, and historic activities is a symptom of cultural suicide and a regression to primitive (totalitarian) living. Governments who are complicit in their indirect (funding, shutting down of objective reporting and using their power to encourage rather than restrain unlawful and inhumane activities) participation in the killing fields, the tacit and often obvious approval of humanitarian crimes now pretending to "care" and to enact legal prohibitions (that have nothing to do with true, natural law) to shut down discourse are revealing their true nature and any reasonable "right" they have to "represent" their people or to act in governance over anyone is suspect and illegitimate on its face...Prayers for peace, not annihilation. Prayers for truth to be revealed, untainted and unencumbered. Prayers for reasonability and justice to prevail where evil now roams freely, devouring everyone in its path.

Expand full comment

I hear you, as an ex-Fundamentalist Biblical Zionist Christian. Sadly, I hate to need to remind you that Judaism invented GENOCIDE and then told everyone who remained "Don't worry, GOD told us we had to do it!" Zionism is the biggest problem, but so is Torah Judaism and Biblical Zionist Christianity. Prayer won't do much. God is not intervening. God is not voting. People have to stand up and - both physically and verbally - stop young and old civilians dying and being forgotten. Belief in Martyrdom makes things worse, as people wait for God to act!!

Expand full comment

What has occurred in Palestine (now Lebanon as well as the West Bank, and soon the whole region if this persists on its present course, unabated and unchecked as GB & US continue to arm and fund the aggression-in-process) - at the hands of a geopolitical movement (with origins in GB & Germany) who intentionally chose to call their declared nation state in their own declaration of independence document (though they have no constitution and obviously no moral laws of a humane nature) "Israel" to engender sympathy for the apartheid occupier state being formed in a continuation of (and to further the continuing colonial interests of) the "occupy and assimilate or exterminate" mother ship, Great Britain and the City of London, and by extension, the U.S. INC, taking for themselves the identity and (per their Babylonian Talmudic beliefs) long-cultivated, associated and well indoctrinated and disseminated empathy and support for thousands of years of homelessness and estrangement, wars and ethnic cleansings specific to an ethnic people group (not a country!) of the same name/designation who were originally set apart by God to both be a special people for Himself and to be the vehicle through which He would make Himself known among all nations of the bible in ancient times who then experienced severe ethnic cleansing and estrangement from their lands in WWII - is a tragic and wholly preventable chapter in a history of conquests and disenfranchisements, of suppression of cultures and the purposeful and deliberate extinguishing of peoples and histories, of a stolen heritage of life that is sacred and deserves respect and reverence, not hatred and the infliction of every kind of anguish and maltreatment. They are not one and the same -- a nation state created to attract ethnically-oriented people (vastly comprised of white Equropean Khazarian/Ashkenazi converts to Judaism) from other parts of the world, incentivized to desire and possess a mono-cultural "homeland" of their own (who in many cases were unwelcome in other countries), and the purposeful immigration/invasion of Palestine, the seizure of property, homes, land and the ousting of indigenous peoples initially with British armed assistance, then later as a multi-nation-sponsored menace, that claims biblical justification for every kind of inhumane terrorization and extermination of a people group comprised of many faiths and the leveraging of foreign powers to both help supplant and discredit the local population and to inflict harm to empathetic Arab nations in the surrounding area and an historic people group who initially rejected the promised Messiah and are now seeking to manifest him via the intentional, planned, and cultivated rhetoric of reclaiming lands (and resources & the power that accompanies that) and displacing all other people groups, discrediting them and vilifying them, and insisting that they, as the ultimate "victims" possess a right to exist (as a nation state, which is not tenable for any nation since their existence, as are other nations is self-declared and based on the sacred document they created and the use of force to create its reality) regardless of and without due consideration of the outright theft and genocide they are conducting and have done so for 75+ years in order to take what they desire at any cost from those who would at many points in the past been willing to co-exist peacefully as history demonstrates they once did is fraud of a magnitude and caliber that is patently untenable. I remain a dispensational premillenialist but O cannot and do not equate the nation state calling itself "Israel" with the people of the bible and hold out that a day is coming, that God Himself knows, when He will enjoin them once again -- however, the possession of the promised land is a promise made to Abraham's "seed" (singular" and therefore it was to Christ Jesus the Messiah and Savior, not to an unregenerate people group who remain outside of the new covenant forged in the blood sacrifice of Christ to satisfy the demand of the Old Testament Law and the system of sacrifices that were prefigured before His arrival. And the idea that when God judges the "nations" he is judging "countries" is not congruent with the definition of nations in the bible -- which are people groups of common ancestry, etc., those with commonly held beliefs, kinship groups and individuals (not countries or states) -- which is how salvation is now administered one-on-one -- how it was always intended to be administered as the Old Testament is the demonstration of the impossibility for us to attain to the level of righteousness necessary to enjoy relationship with a Holy God, manifested in His triunity (with Son & Spirit ["Elohim" in Genesis] -- a compound unity. Paul explained that one day God will once again test His original people and through that test (the time of Jacob's trouble - a final 7 year period of earth's history) and the judgements and tumultuous events that will characterize it, they will (12,000 from each of the 12 original tribes) recognize and embrace their Messiah Jesus. But the nation state called Israel" is just that - an occupier state that is not representing the God of the bible and in fact is committing atrocities that bring shame even to the name they have taken for themselves, whose actions belie their true nature and character. They cannot acquire land in the manner being pursued, nor can they justify it as an act of God -- He Himself will one day act and it will be on His terms, not theirs, and just punishment will occur.

Expand full comment

Shocking and disturbing, trying to silence us because the real reason uk government still sending arms to IDF is https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/keir-starmer-labour-party-quadrature-donation-arms-companies-israel-war-gaza/ the government complicit to genocide and murder and have to stop us from getting the truth out there.

Expand full comment

The ongoing discourse surrounding global wealth inequality continues to spotlight the colossal concentration of wealth in the hands of a select few. Research indicates that the top 20 wealthiest individuals and companies around the globe hold an immense portion of global resources, igniting a debate on equitable wealth distribution.

**The Titans of Wealth**

The wealthiest individuals in the world, as of the latest data, include visionaries like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bernard Arnault, Bill Gates, and Warren Buffet. Others such as Larry Ellison, Larry Page, and Sergey Brin occupy this elite list. These individuals have built their fortunes through tech innovations, luxury empires, and strategic investments.

Simultaneously, renowned companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Saudi Aramco, Amazon, and Alphabet lead the corporate sector. Industries spanning from technology, energy, and retail are represented by corporations like Tesla, Facebook, Alibaba, and Berkshire Hathaway, which contribute significantly to global GDP.

**Redistribution for Global Betterment**

Reimagining a world where wealth serves humanity's collective good begins with detailed financial transparency. Comprehensive audits and valuations reveal that these top entities control trillions of dollars. Wealth is often stored in vast real estate holdings, shares, bonds, and diversified investments.

To bridge the inequality gap, a multifaceted wealth redistribution strategy is proposed that adheres to global legal frameworks yet emphasizes moral imperatives.

1. **Global Free Healthcare and Education**: By reallocating just a fraction of the accumulated wealth, substantial funding can be devoted to universal healthcare and education. Historical data suggests that a fraction of 1% of the individual and corporate wealth pool could transform both sectors, ensuring no family bears the burden of illness or the quest for knowledge.

2. **Poverty Alleviation and Middle-Class Empowerment**: Establishing a global fund financed by a focused levy on mega fortunes would concentrate on eradicating poverty. This fund would empower citizens worldwide, allowing universal access to middle-class status through infrastructural development, entrepreneurship programs, and skill-building initiatives.

3. **Global Union Rights**: A cooperative global effort affirms that labor rights are human rights. Creating a universally recognized labor rights charter, backed by severe penalties, would deter any attempt to subvert workers’ rights. Special judicial bodies could be established to enforce these rights, ensuring that the economic gains lift all boats.

**Unifying for a Just Future**

Achieving this vision demands unprecedented global solidarity. While wealth does not translate easily into cash flow, its conversion into universal benefits can be achieved through technology-driven platforms, transparent financial systems, and cooperative policies.

Global unity is vital. While force should be the last resort, strategic partnerships with international organizations, advocates, and enlightened leadership pave the way. A globally legal approach is both achievable and imperative for sustainable transformation.

In this grand endeavor, the focus must remain on justice and inclusion. By respecting legal norms yet relentlessly pushing forward equitable reforms, humanity can craft an era where wealth wisely used heralds an era of shared abundance.

Expand full comment

How the f can this be real -??? Seriously how????

Expand full comment