Senator Graham was gleefully yelling that "the right people" were dying in Ukraine, for example. Asserting his moral certainty, as you put it. So maybe that's where your question ought properly to be directed? (Easy to turn a statement into a question ain't it?)
You’re actually proving my point with this response. Instead of engaging a serious question about how we talk about death, you deflect to Graham and then try to dunk on the way I phrased it.
That’s interesting, because my question wasn’t a team‑sport challenge, it was about humanity: what does it do to us when we get comfortable saying “it’s good he’s dead” about anyone? The heat in your reply suggests the question landed closer to home than you’re letting on.
Funny how the people so interested in humanity are the most unethical and amoral haters in the world. This comment is despicable, but not surprising given The Dissident's core belief of anger, hatred, and lack of compassion for others.
It's not often that we rejoice when someone dies; this is one of those rare times. Israel lost a dear friend.
Hypocritical in his private life; hypercritical in his public life. A conflicted soul who unfortunately always silenced his measure of good angels.
He was vindictive and mean, which was exactly why Trump adored him.
Ding dong, the witch is dead
(Men can be witches, right?)
100%. It’s impossible to deny that Graham’s death will save countless lives. He would hate that, too, so yay! RIHell Lady Graham.
All that good blackmail going to waste...
>>‘They’ll tell me things our own government won’t tell me,’ he said.<<
So, what Huckleberry J Butchmeup was admitting was that he swallowed hasbara without checking to see if it was in any way factual or not.
Oh but it's much better with the author in it. How toxic can you be and still believe that you aren't part of the degradation of society and culture?
“It's good he’s dead.”
What’s it like to be so morally certain of who should live and who should die?
Senator Graham was gleefully yelling that "the right people" were dying in Ukraine, for example. Asserting his moral certainty, as you put it. So maybe that's where your question ought properly to be directed? (Easy to turn a statement into a question ain't it?)
You’re actually proving my point with this response. Instead of engaging a serious question about how we talk about death, you deflect to Graham and then try to dunk on the way I phrased it.
That’s interesting, because my question wasn’t a team‑sport challenge, it was about humanity: what does it do to us when we get comfortable saying “it’s good he’s dead” about anyone? The heat in your reply suggests the question landed closer to home than you’re letting on.
Funny how the people so interested in humanity are the most unethical and amoral haters in the world. This comment is despicable, but not surprising given The Dissident's core belief of anger, hatred, and lack of compassion for others.
The words and actions of Lindsay Graham define ignorance, prejudice, hate and murder. No more; no less. That is the truth, the simply truth.
dennis hanna
Proof election are rigged
You had your own Adolf Hitler.
https://substack.com/@omega4america/note/p-206587416?r=fb1xg
Spread the word