NATO is saying no now. albert venezio was referring to the overthrow, sodomization, and murder of the great Libyan leader Muamar Gadaffi, who served his people, and made the desert bloom.
Though Gadaffi's great crime seems to have been his conception of a pan-African currency, like the Euro. Except his would be backed by gold. That, of course, would have played hell (destroyed?) the fiat currency the West runs on. A short time before his gold coins came on line, his country was attacked by "terrorists," and NATO came in behind them with bombers. NATO bombed the irrigated fields in the desert. For good measure, they bombed the factory that made the irrigation pipes. I call that a war crime. The attack on a sovereign country was one already.
As I recall, we were told Gadaffi had to be attacked and removed because he was "killing his own people." I expect we will attack Israel any day now. Right?
Chabad-Lubawicz Talmudic cult is responsible for the Ukraine war that started with a coup to bring Kiev Zionist regime in 2014 and the genocide of Russians (killing 14,000 civilians) before Putin’s SMO. Keep in mind the territory in dispute is the homeland of Chabad-Lubawicz cult.
Of course. Brown people are too stupid to think for themselves. Millions of them take to the streets multiple times since 2009 because Israel tells them to 🤡.
Masterful propaganda construction here. Let's appreciate the craft:
Move 1: Lead with the scandal
"Israeli Paper Admits"—framing normal intelligence operations as shocking confession. Sets the tone that you're learning forbidden truth.
Move 2: Bury what makes it routine
Mossad doing Mossad things (exploiting grievances, amplifying protests, providing tactical support) is presented as uniquely outrageous rather than standard intelligence tradecraft practiced by CIA, MI6, FSB, and every other major service for decades.
Move 3: Erase U.S. agency
The entire framing requires believing U.S. intelligence—with satellites, SIGINT, decades of Iran regime-change planning, and their own history of manufacturing exactly these operations—was somehow blindsided or tricked by Mossad. Trump wasn't "aligned" or "coordinating." He was "convinced." Passive. Duped.
Move 4: Assume causation without measurement
"The enormous work that Israel had put in was behind the demonstrations"—but how do you separate real Iranian grievances (currency collapse, brutal government, decades of unrest) from amplification? You can't. So we get assertion presented as proof.
Move 5: Ignore the obvious alternative
What if U.S. and Israel had shared regime-change objectives and ran complementary operations? What if the January riots provided justification both governments wanted? What if Ynet's "admission" is Israel taking credit for what was joint allied intelligence work?
Nah. Easier story: Israel tricked America into another war.
The tell: This only works if you've never read about CIA operations in Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), or noticed that manufacturing protests to justify regime change is Intelligence 101.
Great example of how propaganda works: take real information (Ynet report), frame it as revelation, ignore context that would normalize it, and guide readers to the predetermined conclusion.
I agree with you on most of the points. However, the main message of the article isn't the US being tricked into this or the mossad taking all the credits, but rather that the narrative about the "barbaric iranian regime killing its own people to stay in power" if not straight up lies, can at least be nuanced with these admissions especially from a isreali centrist outlet like Ynet.
If the main point is just that the “barbaric regime killing its own people” narrative needs nuancing, then why not just say that directly? The Dissident doesn’t do that. It runs with “final nail in the coffin” and “Mossad astroturfed the January riots,” treating a boastful line about “enormous work” as if it were a quantitative proof that foreign ops wholly manufactured the protests.
That is exactly the propaganda construction I laid out: take real reporting (Ynet, NYT), strip out context about standard intelligence tradecraft and pre‑existing grievances, and then sell a totalizing conclusion—“these weren’t real protests, they were fake riots Israel created to trick America into war.”
So I’m not arguing with you that Western coverage is simplistic. I’m asking a different question: if the author has to lean this hard on framing tricks you agree are there, why treat the outlet and its reporting as straightforwardly honest rather than as running its own narrative op? At some point the packaging tells you what game is being played.
If true, this should not come as a surprise. The Israelis are incredibly proficient at managing public opinion globally. It should not surprise us that they’d be able to influence opinions and ultimately behaviour in Iran.
The outside world has the captured status of the media to help them along. The nepotism of just a few Zionists a hundred-ten, -twenty years ago is showing its dividends now, in the total 5th column status of most of our "4th estates".
I don't know what they would have like that, in Iran. Yes some moles in place, in high places, and we should learn from the Iranians who I believe did go through their ranks with lice combs.
They used that as propaganda out here, isn't that the case? But who can blame any country, even an easygoing one, for dealing with moles in a way that doesn't let them keep attacking.
I had gotten the impression that's what the starlink smuggling was about, it was their mole work I mean, and those units were used to coordinate across country. Isn't it that the snipers would start trouble then would blend in to urge it in a direction. It's my understanding, that's who the few thousand dead were associated with: their victims, and then they, themselves being taken out.
And you know what? The vile western media will still parrot the same narrative of Iranian gov killing its own people.. even if IzraHell shows them actual footage of mossad agents in the act. Facts are a mild inconvenience at this point. They’ve perfected the art of BS that it now smells rosy to their noses.
Good, though we already knew. Plus former CIA Director Mike Pompeo plainly outlined on X right the CIA and Mossad’s involvement, on the ground in Iran around the time the riots began to brew.
Isn't it just Heaven the way ZioSATANist DemonCanniBA'ALS become so "Tortured" by their imagined victories that they cannot help but tell on themselves in celebration of themselves❓
They thought the Iranians were as stupid and gullible as the Americans, british and germans? Not a chance. Peddle your dumbshit with braindead western pigs, it works great here.
Zio-Nazi Terrorist Scum! The same thing MI6, CIA and Mossad did to a True Peoples Hero Qaddafi!
Yes, but they also got NATO to help them. That was a great crime.
They caused the trouble and then NATO came in.
I don't think that was a coincidence, but a timeline.
NATO is saying no now. albert venezio was referring to the overthrow, sodomization, and murder of the great Libyan leader Muamar Gadaffi, who served his people, and made the desert bloom.
Though Gadaffi's great crime seems to have been his conception of a pan-African currency, like the Euro. Except his would be backed by gold. That, of course, would have played hell (destroyed?) the fiat currency the West runs on. A short time before his gold coins came on line, his country was attacked by "terrorists," and NATO came in behind them with bombers. NATO bombed the irrigated fields in the desert. For good measure, they bombed the factory that made the irrigation pipes. I call that a war crime. The attack on a sovereign country was one already.
As I recall, we were told Gadaffi had to be attacked and removed because he was "killing his own people." I expect we will attack Israel any day now. Right?
Chabad-Lubawicz Talmudic cult is responsible for the Ukraine war that started with a coup to bring Kiev Zionist regime in 2014 and the genocide of Russians (killing 14,000 civilians) before Putin’s SMO. Keep in mind the territory in dispute is the homeland of Chabad-Lubawicz cult.
Zios are responsible for most conflicts.
Clearly. I knew many of them in Brooklyn. A few are good people trapped.
Of course. Brown people are too stupid to think for themselves. Millions of them take to the streets multiple times since 2009 because Israel tells them to 🤡.
Obviously you are either a NeoCon clown or ignorant!
Of course
This leaves the Iranian people in an impossible place any demands for a normal country is just Zionist meddling.
Masterful propaganda construction here. Let's appreciate the craft:
Move 1: Lead with the scandal
"Israeli Paper Admits"—framing normal intelligence operations as shocking confession. Sets the tone that you're learning forbidden truth.
Move 2: Bury what makes it routine
Mossad doing Mossad things (exploiting grievances, amplifying protests, providing tactical support) is presented as uniquely outrageous rather than standard intelligence tradecraft practiced by CIA, MI6, FSB, and every other major service for decades.
Move 3: Erase U.S. agency
The entire framing requires believing U.S. intelligence—with satellites, SIGINT, decades of Iran regime-change planning, and their own history of manufacturing exactly these operations—was somehow blindsided or tricked by Mossad. Trump wasn't "aligned" or "coordinating." He was "convinced." Passive. Duped.
Move 4: Assume causation without measurement
"The enormous work that Israel had put in was behind the demonstrations"—but how do you separate real Iranian grievances (currency collapse, brutal government, decades of unrest) from amplification? You can't. So we get assertion presented as proof.
Move 5: Ignore the obvious alternative
What if U.S. and Israel had shared regime-change objectives and ran complementary operations? What if the January riots provided justification both governments wanted? What if Ynet's "admission" is Israel taking credit for what was joint allied intelligence work?
Nah. Easier story: Israel tricked America into another war.
The tell: This only works if you've never read about CIA operations in Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), or noticed that manufacturing protests to justify regime change is Intelligence 101.
Great example of how propaganda works: take real information (Ynet report), frame it as revelation, ignore context that would normalize it, and guide readers to the predetermined conclusion.
Well done. Sincerely.
I agree with you on most of the points. However, the main message of the article isn't the US being tricked into this or the mossad taking all the credits, but rather that the narrative about the "barbaric iranian regime killing its own people to stay in power" if not straight up lies, can at least be nuanced with these admissions especially from a isreali centrist outlet like Ynet.
If the main point is just that the “barbaric regime killing its own people” narrative needs nuancing, then why not just say that directly? The Dissident doesn’t do that. It runs with “final nail in the coffin” and “Mossad astroturfed the January riots,” treating a boastful line about “enormous work” as if it were a quantitative proof that foreign ops wholly manufactured the protests.
That is exactly the propaganda construction I laid out: take real reporting (Ynet, NYT), strip out context about standard intelligence tradecraft and pre‑existing grievances, and then sell a totalizing conclusion—“these weren’t real protests, they were fake riots Israel created to trick America into war.”
So I’m not arguing with you that Western coverage is simplistic. I’m asking a different question: if the author has to lean this hard on framing tricks you agree are there, why treat the outlet and its reporting as straightforwardly honest rather than as running its own narrative op? At some point the packaging tells you what game is being played.
If true, this should not come as a surprise. The Israelis are incredibly proficient at managing public opinion globally. It should not surprise us that they’d be able to influence opinions and ultimately behaviour in Iran.
The outside world has the captured status of the media to help them along. The nepotism of just a few Zionists a hundred-ten, -twenty years ago is showing its dividends now, in the total 5th column status of most of our "4th estates".
I don't know what they would have like that, in Iran. Yes some moles in place, in high places, and we should learn from the Iranians who I believe did go through their ranks with lice combs.
They used that as propaganda out here, isn't that the case? But who can blame any country, even an easygoing one, for dealing with moles in a way that doesn't let them keep attacking.
I had gotten the impression that's what the starlink smuggling was about, it was their mole work I mean, and those units were used to coordinate across country. Isn't it that the snipers would start trouble then would blend in to urge it in a direction. It's my understanding, that's who the few thousand dead were associated with: their victims, and then they, themselves being taken out.
And you know what? The vile western media will still parrot the same narrative of Iranian gov killing its own people.. even if IzraHell shows them actual footage of mossad agents in the act. Facts are a mild inconvenience at this point. They’ve perfected the art of BS that it now smells rosy to their noses.
Wow, this is beyond evil. How long until Trump & Co. Do the same?
Old news to anyone who has been paying attention
Israel is an contaminated wart on the face of the earth.
The Zio-Nazi Terrorist Scum Bags were behind 9/11, October 7, and the assassination of JFK among other terroristic acts around the would
Good, though we already knew. Plus former CIA Director Mike Pompeo plainly outlined on X right the CIA and Mossad’s involvement, on the ground in Iran around the time the riots began to brew.
We knew this already, but know one could prove it. Trump was in on it too.
…you dont say!
Isn't it just Heaven the way ZioSATANist DemonCanniBA'ALS become so "Tortured" by their imagined victories that they cannot help but tell on themselves in celebration of themselves❓
They thought the Iranians were as stupid and gullible as the Americans, british and germans? Not a chance. Peddle your dumbshit with braindead western pigs, it works great here.
Duh!